Topic: Peer Review 2
Paper details:

Peer Review 2
Points 100 Submitting a file upload File Types doc, docx, and rtf
Learning Objectives Covered

LO1: Gain practice using peer review to improve writing through constructive feedback

LO2: Work through the editing and revising steps of the writing process.

———

This week, you will evaluate the effectiveness of a student’s Rogerian argumentative essay. Be sure to use the guidelines of our discussion in this week’s online lecture as a standard for your evaluation.

Step 1:

Read the following essay demonstrating techniques of a Rogerian Argumentative Essay:

Peer Review Week 2 – RogerianArgument.pdfPreview the document

Step 2:

Answer the questions on this worksheet to conduct your peer evaluation. Be sure to answer each question with at least one sentence. Submit the worksheet as your assignment:

Peer Review 2- Rogerian Argument Evaluation Worksheet.docxPreview the document

File UploadGoogle Doc
Upload a file, or choose a file you’ve already uploaded.
File:
Add Another File
Click here to find a file you’ve already uploaded

Comments…

Rubric
Peer Review
Peer Review
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Timeliness
Writing samples submitted prior to deadline to allow others to provide feedback. Substantive feedback is provided to teammate in a timely manner.
20.0 pts
Sufficient: Own writing submitted at start of class; feedback returned by end of class.
12.0 pts
Insufficient: Incomplete or submitted late.
0.0 pts
No Marks
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Quality of Feedback
Provided meaningful feedback on content, structure, organization, clarity
40.0 pts
Sufficient: Comments include specific suggestions to improve quality of ideas, structure, and organization, as well as note areas of weakness and opportunities for improvement.
24.0 pts
Insufficient: Comments are superficial. Methods for improvement: use any and all resources provided in class to help with assessing other writer’s work.
0.0 pts
No Marks
40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Disposition
Provided all comments in a positive, encouraging, and constructive manner
40.0 pts
Sufficient: Appropriate praise is given when identifying strengths, and constructive, encouraging feedback addresses weaknesses with alternatives that might be considered.
24.0 pts
Insufficient: Comments are non-encouraging, and/or might be interpreted as insulting
0.0 pts
No Marks
40.0 pts
Total Points: 100.0