using the theories of legal feminism,critically discuss why the act of female toplessness DOES NOT constitute a social harm
In Canada, as of 2005 [Labaye], acts of criminal indecency must be shown to cause serious social harm. Using the theories of Durkheim OR legal feminism, critically discuss why or why not the act of female public toplessness constitutes a ?social harm.?
R v Jacob (1996) 31 O.R. (3d) 350 (Ont CA)
R. v. Labaye, 2005 SCC 80 http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc80/2005scc80.pdf
THESE CASES OR AT LEASE ONE OF THEM SHOULD BE USED IN THE ESSAY.
Essay: (6-7 pages, 12pt double spaced). The final essay should include the
? A title page (the title of your essay), your name & student #, the name of your TA.
? A clear statement of your thesis in the essay (opening paragraph)
? Reference a minimum of 2 course materials and 3 additional scholarly sources
? Well-developed concise arguments supported by evidence addressing the topic
and reflecting on the issues outlined in the essay question.
? Complete footnotes, endnotes, or in-text referencing and a bibliography.
You will be evaluated on:
? Coherence of argument and use of evidence
? Depth of analysis and range of literature covered
? Literacy and accuracy
? References and bibliography