Question description

A minus research proposal.docx – EXAMPLE !!!!!Purpose:  The purpose of this paper for this course is
twofold: 1) to demonstrate and extend your understanding of the concept/theory
you’ve chosen to examine, 2) to further develop the skills necessary to design
a reasonably sound research study. 
Procedure:
Your
paper will be typed, double-spaced, 7-10 pages in basic APA style.  Please include a
· 
Title
Page
· 
Abstract
· 
Running
Header
· 
Page
Numbers
· 
Reference
Page. 
The title
page and reference pages will NOT be counted as the page requirement. Your
paper should include the following:
Choose
a topic of interest.  Be sure your
question is something you’re interested in knowing, not just for the sake
of completing the assignment.  You
may choose a topic that we cover in class, one you’ve found in the text
that we won’t cover in class, or another topic that is closely related to
the course material. 
Literature
Review: This is the theoretical framework; therefore, it is very
important.  Find at least 5 outside, scholarly sources.  The sources must have been published between
the years 2000-2013.  The
objective of this section is not only to provide support or your topic,
but also to inform you of current research and guide you to develop your
own design.
Methods:  The method section answers the
questions, “What will you do to find the answer to your question, or prove
your hypothesis correct?” Include the specifics of how you will set this
up.  Include which research design
you will use and why.  Include which
statistical analysis you will perform. 

Statement
of Hypothesis:  Provide your
hypothesis, including 1 dependent and 1 independent variable.
After
reading this section, I should be able to easily follow your instructions and
conduct the study myself.  If there are
any holes in your methods, your procedures are not clear enough.From the following topics please choose 1 to talk about through out the whole paper MOTIVATION TOPICSintrinsic/extrinsic motivationgoal orientationattribution theoryself-handicappingstereotype threatsocial cognitive theoryreciprocal determinismself-efficacyself-regulationself-determination theorymotivation and technology….LEARNING/BEHAVIORISMrewards and punishmentsoperant conditioningsuperstitionslearned helplessnessclassical conditioninggarcia effectemotions and learning/behavior/motivationobservational learning Here is the Rubric which it will be graded on 

Levels of Performance

Literature
Review/Introduction
20

Statement
of hypothesis 
20

Explanation
of methodology
20

Grammar
20

Exceeds criteria  70-80 pts

Provides
exceptional descriptions of articles and how they relate to topic.

Clearly
states the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis.  Provides reasons why author chose this
topic AND/OR why topic is important to the field of psychology. Keeps it
simple: one dependent variable and one independent variable.

Provides an
in-depth explanation of the design. 
Design is appropriate to the hypothesis.
Thoroughly
demonstrates how author will control for confounding variables.

No grammar or spelling errors. Smooth transitions
from paragraph to paragraph.  Easy to
read and follow.

60-69
Meets criteria

Provides
sufficient descriptions of articles and how they relate to the topic.

Clearly
states the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis.  Keeps it simple: one dependent variable and
one independent variable.

Provides a
sufficient explanation of the design. 
Design is appropriate to the hypothesis.
Demonstrates how
author will control for confounding variables.

One or two grammar or spelling errors. Smooth
transitions from paragraph to paragraph. 
Easy to read and follow.

50-59
Progressing towards meeting criteria

Provides
barely sufficient descriptions of articles and how they relate to the topic.

States
the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis.  Hypotheses may not be relevant or simple.

Provides a somewhat sufficient or clear explanation of design.  Design may or may not be appropriate to the
hypothesis.
Some demonstration of how author will control for confounding
variables.

Several grammar or spelling errors. Choppy or no
transitions from paragraph to paragraph. 

40-49
Does not meet criteria

Does not provide sufficient descriptions of articles and few, if any,
demonstrations of how articles are relevant.

Does
not state the null hypothesis and/or the alternative hypothesis.  Hypotheses is not relevant or simple.

Provides an insufficient or unclear explanation of design.  Design is not explained or not appropriate
to the hypothesis.
No demonstration of how author will control for  confounding variables OR insufficient
controls.

Many glaring grammar or spelling errors. Choppy or
no transitions from paragraph to paragraph. 
Hard to follow.

<40 Absent/Off taskProvides no descriptions of articles AND/OR articles are not related to topic.Provides no hypotheses statements. DProvides no explanation of design or controls.Paper is impossible to read because of grammar and spelling errors.

"Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now"

UK BEST WRITING