Summarize the two advocacy campaigns you researched in this area.Explain the attributes that made those campaigns effective.

Summarize the two advocacy campaigns you researched in this area.
Explain the attributes that made those campaigns effective.

Developing a Health Advocacy Campaign
Developing a Health Advocacy Campaign
To complete:
For the Part 1 application (4 pages of content with a title page and references in APA format) address the following:
Describe your selected population health issue and the population affected by this issue.
population: Hispanic American
health issue: Obesity

Summarize the two advocacy campaigns you researched in this area.
Explain the attributes that made those campaigns effective.
Begin to develop a plan for a health advocacy campaign that seeks to create a new policy or change an existing policy with regard to the issue and population you selected. Be sure to include in your plan:
A description of the public health issue and proposed policy solution
Specific objectives for the policy you want to be implemented
Begin to substantiate of your proposed campaign by data and evidence.
Rubric-Evaluation Criteria for Applications and Formal Papers

Levels of Achievement
Criteria
Outstanding Performance
Excellent Performance
Competent Performance
Proficient Performance
Room for Improvement
QUALITY OF WORK SUBMITTED –

1. The extent to which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking (0-30 Points)
30 to 30 points
Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics
25 to 29 points
Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics
20 to 24 points
Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.
16 to 19 points
Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed.
0 to 15 points
Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed.
QUALITY OF WORK SUBMITTED: Purpose of the paper is clear (0-5 Points)
5 to 5 points
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria.
5 to 5 points
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria.
4 to 4 points
Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
1 to 3 points
Purpose of the assignment is vague.
0 to 0 points
No purpose statement was provided.
ASSIMILATION AND SYNTHESIS OF IDEAS

The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to-

1. Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts (0-10 Points)
10 to 10 points
Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts.
9 to 9 points
Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts.
8 to 8 points
Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts.
5 to 7 points
Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts.
0 to 4 points
Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics.

ASSIMILATION AND SYNTHESIS OF IDEAS 2. Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources (0-20 Points)
20 to 20 points
Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 3-4 course resources to support point of view.
15 to 19 points
Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 3-4 course resources to support point of view.
10 to 14 points
Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 3 to 4 course resources to support major points and point of view.
3 to 9 points
Minimally includes and integrates specific information from 2-3 resources to support major points and point of view.
0 to 2 points
Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resource to support major points and point of view.
ASSIMILATION AND SYNTHESIS OF IDEAS 3. Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections. (0-20 Points)
20 to 20 points
Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Applies meaning to the field of advanced nursing practice.
18 to 19 points
Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Applies meaning to the field of advanced nursing practice.
16 to 17 points
Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize.
14 to 15 points
Identifies but does not interpret or apply concepts, and/or strategies correctly; ideas unclear and/or underdeveloped.
0 to 13 points
Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies.
WRITTEN EXPRESSION AND FORMATTING 1. Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. (0-5 Points)
5 to 5 points
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards.
5 to 5 points
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards.
4 to 4 points
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards 80% of the time.
3 to 3 points
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards 70% of the time.
0 to 2 points
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards < 70% of the time.

WRITTEN EXPRESSION AND FORMATTING 2. English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation (0-5 Points)
5 to 5 points
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
5 to 5 points
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
4 to 4 points
Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3 to 3 points
Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3
0 to 2 points
Contains many (= 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
WRITTEN EXPRESSION AND FORMATTING 3. The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list (0-5 Points)
5 to 5 points
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
5 to 5 points
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
4 to 4 points
Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.
3 to 3 points
Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.
0 to 2 points
Contains many (= 5) APA format errors.


 

. WITH BEST NURSING TUTORS TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT

get-your-custom-paper


.

.

 

The post Summarize the two advocacy campaigns you researched in this area.Explain the attributes that made those campaigns effective. appeared first on BEST NURSING TUTORS.

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.


The post Summarize the two advocacy campaigns you researched in this area.Explain the attributes that made those campaigns effective. appeared first on The Nursing Hub.

 

"Is this question part of your assignment? We Can Help!"

Essay Writing Service